Second Oswald

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Second Oswald. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Second Oswald paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Second Oswald, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Second Oswald paper at affordable prices!


The Second Oswald or Harvey and Lee theroy as it has also been named, is based on the idea of two individuals using the name Lee Harvey Oswald and living a parallel existence. One Oswald would ultimately be framed for the assassination of JFK while the other escaped undetected, presumably with the help of whatever government agency or group was responsible for the plot. The main evidense behind this theory are eye witness accounts placing Oswald in various unlikely locations. Many people have reported strange insidenses in which they saw or dealt with Oswald under odd or suggestive circumstances before and after the shooting, which presents the idea of a Second Oswald. Some of these are that Oswald was seen at a rifle range hitting bulls eyes; that he and two Latin types tried to get financing for illegal activities from Mrs. Sylvia Odio; that Oswald tried to cash a check for $18 in Hutchison's Grocery Store. These instances, and there are many of them, were dismissed by the Commission principally on the grounds that they occurred when Oswald apparently was not there, or they involved activities Oswald reportedly did not engage in, such as driving a car. After doing some research on this particular topic I found some interesting essays on the subject of eyewitnesses. Eyewitnesses have fallen under increasing scrutiny in recent years. The psychiatric community has conducted a number of studies to determine the reliability of eyewitnesses and found that their testimony is, by itself, probably not sufficient cause to convict and send someone to jail. It seems to make sense then that the many sightings of Oswald in various places should be held to a high degree of scrutiny. Ph. D. and critic Dennis Ford wrote Memory research has shown that memory is not a copy of an event but a reconstruction. Eyewitness reports are unreliable; contrary to common sense, stress constricts the focus of attention and reduces memory. People remember what they want. People remember what is plausible. People remember a blend of observation and conversation about the observation. People remember what interviewers put in their heads Therefore when finding that this theory is based almost solely on the testimonys of eyewitnesses, I found it less and less believable. As well as that I soon found that the testimonys which were relied on so heavily for this theory to have any credibility at all, were unrelieble and had many discrepancies.The HSCA have done some extensive research on the idea of a second Oswald and come up with sound evidense against the theory. The three strongest points are outlined below.


Write a research paper on Second Oswald


Firstly the HSCA had some of the top experts in the country take a look at handwriting, fingerprints, and photographs in an effort to debunk two Oswald theories in general. On October 15, 156 Lee was fingerprinted and assigned serial number 1650. In December of the same year he was photographed with his serial number displayed at the bottom of the picture. These two records disprove the Second Oswald since the HSCA matched the fingerprints from October 158 to prints taken of LHO in custody in Dallas and New Orleans in 16. The problem is, those are supposed to be the prints of Harvey Oswald. Similarly, the December photo is said to be that of Lee while the HSCA photo panel proved using morphological data that it matched photos of Harvey. Therefore this proves that the Two Oswalds were indeed the same person.One of the most powerful arguments for rebutting the Second Oswald theory is made by the HSCA handwriting analysis. The HSCA panel examined 6 handwriting samples when conducting their study. They found that the same individual wrote many of the samples that should be either Harvey or Lee. Once again proving the Second Oswald theory wrong.. Michael Eddowes, author of The Oswald File was so sure of his theory that a Soviet look-alike was buried in Oswalds grave, that he managed to convince Marina Oswald that the body of LHO should be exhumed and autopsied. In 181 the corpse was exhumed and examined by a team that included two forensic pathologists and two forensic odontologists.The body was positively identified primarily by dental records as that of Oswald. The team concluded, The remains in the grave marked as Lee Harvey Oswald are indeed Lee Harvey Oswald. These three areas provide substantial proof that the theory of a second Oswald is on shaky ground. The theory of two men leading separate but parallel lives in my view is clearly incorrect. I base this opinion not only on the poor evidense supporting the theory, but also the strong evidense brought up against it. Please note that this sample paper on Second Oswald is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Second Oswald, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Second Oswald will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!